Posted by muffled on December 20, 2010, at 1:23:48
In reply to Re: can you supply links to the things you refer to?, posted by morgan miller on December 19, 2010, at 14:04:07
> Yeah I meant to do that, my bad. Here's the entire thread:
>
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faith/20100403/msgs/967761.html
>
>"One of those view points I know have to assess as a believer is psychiatry. Before I knew Christ, I either accepted everything my shrinks told me, or I rejected it all b/c of some sort of Thomas Szasz+Goffman+Foucault-inspired "anti-psychiatry" hogwash."
This is the offending paragraph...
I still absolutely do not get the problem here? He was just expressing his opposing WITHIN HIMSELF views.
"I" either accepted vs "I" rejected-and he explained the why of the rejection.
Again....WHERE is this negative to anyone in any strong way worthy of intervention????
He was talking bout he felt about stuff.
If nayone wanted to counter it, judging by his response to Bob, chances are he(CE) would have handled it with grace.I think stuff like this is SO trivial and so triggering here. because yeah, it IS frightening, its un-undertandable.
IMHO, nothing should have been said at all about it unless someone had a prob, and then they could have addressed it. Then perhaps a thoughtful and enlightening communication could have occured.(and if it went bad, THEN consider stepping in....but it wasn't even a PROBLEM as far as I can tell...)
As it stands now.....manoman, what CAN we say???
Its SO restrictive here.
And confusing.
Cuz truly, I just DO NOT understand.I tend to figger people got good intentions unless proven otherwise.
Give people a chance to rise above, then maybe they will.
But you keep batting them down, often inexplicably....well what chance do they have? They just gonna not say as much or go away.
And I know Bob doesn't care if people go away, he has stated that repeately.
But at what result.....a rather stagnant babble....
poster:muffled
thread:973963
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20101201/msgs/974080.html