Posted by Lou Pilder on September 1, 2010, at 20:57:54
In reply to Lou's request-izwhatihtiz » Dr. Bob, posted by Lou Pilder on September 1, 2010, at 20:30:49
> Mr. Hsiung,
> You wrote,[...please rephrase that...]
> Now to {rephrase} generally means to write it over so that it is {clearer}.
> I can not understand why you have asked for the member here to do that. If you could post your rationale for that here, then I could have the opportuniity to respond accordingly.
> Now if you have a different definition of {rephrase} so that what is what it is then is not, then what is seen is what is seen and we got what we got or not.
> Now if it says what it says, and you are asking the poster to rewrite the statement so that it then can not be seen, then would not the statement in toto have to be redacted? If not, how could what is seen be not seen?
> If the statement has to be rewritten so that what it is is not, then could not the request from you be changed to ,{please redact that}? But could not the statement be deleted then before any request to the poster then and there could be {redacted by the owner/operator) posted by you?
> This then INHO leads me to think that the member asked to rephrase be exempted from the request, for I see any rephrasing as a redaction. Instead, I think (redacted by respondent) because what you got you got.
> Lou Pilder
>
> Friends,
I wrote,[..I think {redacted by respondent}because you got what you got...]
What my postion would be if I was the owner/operator here, would be to leave the statement in toto. The statement has IMHO great value for discusssion here and I would want to leave it as it's original for discussional purposes.
I would redirect the post to the psychology board for discussion, with the discusson related to exploring more of what can be seen in the statement in question so that understanding and learning about the aspects in question could serve as edification and encourement to reveal the underlying or hidden , if any, aspects of the statment in question. You see, there is much more to this IMHO that I would like to post here from my perspective.
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:960581
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/social/20100806/msgs/960986.html