Re: lower block length

Posted by muffled on September 6, 2010, at 12:18:24

In reply to Re: lower block length, posted by Dr. Bob on September 5, 2010, at 19:39:51

> > It was some time since the original post was made, with no further uncivil posts. Might it be possible to put a lower block length if the original poster effectively ceased and desisted after an intervention?
> >
> > Dinah
>
> > I agree...
> >
> > muffled
>
> Would you have preferred a shorter bloc? Or no block at all?
>
> Bob
No block at all would be my preferance. Just let it go.

Thread

Where is Lou? topcatclr 8/30/10
...
(((Dinah))) I'm asking for clarity..... 64Bowtie 8/31/10
Re: (((Dinah))) I'm asking for clarity..... » 64Bowtie Dinah 8/31/10
Re: Re: (((Dinah))) 64Bowtie 9/1/10
:) » 64Bowtie Dinah 9/1/10
Lou's request-izwhatihtiz » Dr. Bob Lou Pilder 9/1/10
Lou explains what he thinks could be done- Lou Pilder 9/1/10
Re: blocked for 6 weeks » topcatclr Dr. Bob 9/4/10
Re: blocked for 6 weeks » Dr. Bob Dinah 9/4/10
Re: blocked for 6 weeks muffled 9/5/10
Re: lower block length Dr. Bob 9/5/10
Re: lower block length » Dr. Bob Dinah 9/5/10
Lou's views-ehvree » Dr. Bob Lou Pilder 9/5/10
Re: lower block length muffled 9/6/10
Re: lower block length Dr. Bob 10/1/10

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:muffled thread:960581
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/social/20100806/msgs/961470.html

	for
in