Posted by Gabbix2 on October 20, 2005, at 1:01:11
In reply to Who's who, posted by Declan on October 20, 2005, at 0:19:32
It's simply an assumption, it happens all the time. (I've been here too long)
People always give their carefully deducted reasons as to why they are sure so and so is so and so..The Scientology aspect is a red herring.
So was not a card carrying Scientologist, he was making a point..this I know. Not that I find the Tenets of Scientology any more frightening than the tenets of any other faith revealed in detail.
And a lot of people are anti-psychiatry.I was brought up Catholic.. until the 1970's women were to go to confession if they wore tampons.. it was apparently sinful as they recieved some sort of "pleasure" from it.
Transubstantiation..Eating a dead body.. that's what communion is.
I don't know if there is any connection between So and Scambuster, they are certainly both precise, intelligent and articulate, but their have been a few extremely intelligent Anti-Babble folks float through here through the years.
Issues and anger aside, My fiance's writing style is uncannily close to Scambuster, he has nothing to do with babble, I don't think he even knows of it's existance.
I do know that if he posted here, taking issue with it people would be *sure* it was him.
poster:Gabbix2
thread:566979
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20051013/msgs/569161.html