Psycho-Babble Social | for general support | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: if pdoc then q

Posted by alexandra_k on December 2, 2005, at 0:32:47 [reposted on December 3, 2005, at 14:38:51 | original URL]

In reply to Re: if pdoc then q » pseudoname, posted by Larry Hoover on December 1, 2005, at 22:56:27

> I like the cases where one single case can disprove the other's point. Not arguing shades of gray.

You like deductive logic then.
There... You only need one counter-example.
When people are using inductive logic...
Then things get trickier...

(though... you can cast inductive as deductive with some little tweaks... you need to learn deductive before inductive to really get it)

 

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Social | Framed

poster:alexandra_k thread:585017
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/social/20051203/msgs/585028.html