Posted by Susan47 on May 31, 2005, at 17:23:22 [reposted on June 2, 2005, at 5:50:41 | original URL]
In reply to Re: Just a thought and a change of subject too » Susan47, posted by alexandra_k on May 31, 2005, at 15:04:32
YOu said, "Typically people argue over whether it really is possible or not (possibility is an objective matter). But possibility aside, we have to grant that it is conceivable / imaginable.
If that is right then it follows that even if the sciences were complete and we knew everything there is to know about the material / physical world - there would be further facts."
I'm just thinking that if we have to grant that anything or that other realities might be conceivable/imaginable, we have to also concede that we would never know for certain that the sciences were complete .. we'd have to concede that we may never know everything there is to know. Is that what you're saying?
poster:Susan47
thread:506754
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/social/20050525/msgs/506762.html