To: All Done

Posted by shadows721 on May 1, 2004, at 0:50:07

In reply to Re: the eyes have it » shadows721, posted by All Done on May 1, 2004, at 0:28:32

I think you brought up a very valid point. You got me thinking about my relationships and what levels of intimacy they had. Thanks for sharing. I am glad you jumped in. Jump in any time. :>

Thread

Is the attraction mutual? BigFish 4/13/04
...
Re: Levels of intimacy and confusion » shadows721 Dinah 4/30/04
Re: the eyes have it » shadows721 Fallen4MyT 4/30/04
Re: Levels of intimacy and confusion » Dinah Fallen4MyT 4/30/04
Re: Let's get the denial out in the open » joslynn Fallen4MyT 4/30/04
Re: the rules » Fallen4MyT noa 4/30/04
Re: the rules » crushedout noa 4/30/04
Re: This is why they made the rules » shadows721 noa 4/30/04
Re: the rules » noa Fallen4MyT 4/30/04
To: Fallen4myT more info about the shadows shadows721 5/1/04
To: Dinah shadows721 5/1/04
To: noa shadows721 5/1/04
Re: the eyes have it » shadows721 All Done 5/1/04
To: All Done shadows721 5/1/04
Re: To: Fallen4myT more info about the shadows » shadows721 Fallen4MyT 5/1/04
Re: To: Fallen4myT shadows721 5/1/04
to Fallen: I agree. We disagree: (nm) shadows721 5/1/04
Re: to Fallen: I agree. We disagree: toomuchpain 5/1/04
non-sexual boundry crossing lucy stone 5/1/04
Re: non-sexual boundry crossing shadows721 5/1/04
Re: To: Fallen4myT more info about the shadows » Fallen4MyT Dinah 5/1/04
Re: blocked for week » shadows721 Dr. Bob 5/1/04
Re: the eyes have it » shadows721 Fallen4MyT 5/1/04
Re: To: Fallen4myT more info about the shadows » Dinah Fallen4MyT 5/1/04
Re: non-sexual boundry crossing » lucy stone Fallen4MyT 5/1/04
Re: To: Fallen4myT more info about the shadows gardenergirl 5/1/04
Re: To: Fallen4myT more info about the shadows » gardenergirl Fallen4MyT 5/1/04

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:shadows721 thread:336073
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/psycho/20040426/msgs/342063.html