Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Torture, a clarification » verne

Posted by Jakeman on November 15, 2005, at 22:54:02

In reply to Tree Frogs, Quilts, and Pine Cones » Jakeman, posted by verne on November 14, 2005, at 22:46:22

> When I said it's not "black and white", I'm not suggesting I condone torture or there's any room for doubt in my own mind, but only that there's enough gray area for discussion. That, in many circles, including the government, it's being debated. That, in some minds, at least, there's room for discussion. (The original topic also included inhumane treatment of prisoners)
>
> Then the question becomes, how is this topic discussed civilly? Even though, we may not think there's anything to debate about, how do we talk about the unspeakable, if the discussion already exists?
>
> We can say torture and inhumane treatment are wrong but what we can't say, is, anyone who disagrees with me should be "viewed with contempt". Such comments end any sort of civil discussion and don't really further our argument anyway.
>
> What if we don't really see any room for discussion, that our side is wholly right, and their's, wholly wrong? And what we really want to do, is throw red dye on their fur coats, cut their tuna nets, or yell at them - not discuss the matter! Like hockey, psychobabble has rules - well, maybe hockey was a bad example.
>
> We can say x, y and z are always bad in every way imaginable, we can describe our position at length, we can unmercifully win the argument with well-crafted wit, superior debating skills, and unrelenting logic, we can outquote and outreference them, but what we can't do, is attack those who disagree with us. We can't get personal.
>
> This is the point I try to be making.
>
> Verne

It was not my intention to cut off any discussion about the pros or cons of torture on this board. And I didn't make any derogatory personal statements toward others on this board. Let's talk, by all means! I want to hear all sides.

I was referring to policies advocated by some in our admistration. I DO think it is a is black and white issue for our government, and they are deciding it now. Are our reps in favor or not? We, (US citizens) are making a historic decision here that affects many people. It's one of those black and white questions of all time. Can one ask, where do you stand? Yes, by all means, let's discuss it here, civilly of course.

warm regards, Jake


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Jakeman thread:578172
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20051013/msgs/579164.html