Posted by alexandra_k on June 7, 2019, at 23:10:12
In reply to Re: informant, posted by alexandra_k on June 7, 2019, at 22:58:25
They did have an okay ethics statement sort of a thing. There were some good ideas. About the spirit of the rules. About how you try and apply that. About accountability for that. About how you will be in trouble if they think you cannot grasp something along the lines of the spirit which results in your doing things that a bunch of people find problematic...
It read well. Seemed sensible. Wasn't idiotic.
The compulsory typographical error / equivalent.
That doesn't actually matter.
But pops out. In a synasthesia kind of a way.
Working for Doctors, Working for Patients.
Maybe less capital letters. Sigh. I'm not sure. Some stuff pops out. I don't know why. Other stuff I don't seem to be able to grasp, particularly. Apostrophe rule. My issues are to do with singular vs group. Apparently that isnt' the issue so much as possession. Huh. There are Deep Issues There. Hrmph.
poster:alexandra_k
thread:1104778
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/social/20181103/msgs/1104783.html