Posted by Sarah T. on January 17, 2006, at 0:08:36
In reply to Re: On a lighter note. . . Hollywood unwed pregnan » Sarah T., posted by Dinah on January 16, 2006, at 17:59:03
> Given the overall duration of Hollywood marriages, the added security may indeed be an illusion. >
That's true. Some of the pregnant unmarried actresses are saying they'll be getting married soon or after the pregnancy. One (I think it was Katie Holmes) said she didn't want to walk down the aisle while pregnant.
> Although I suppose we don't hear as much about the thirty year marriages in Hollywood.>
Paul Newman and Joanne Woodward are the only ones I can think of at the moment.
> Maybe it has something to do with the fact that very rich single moms don't face some of the challenges that other single moms face. I can't imagine functioning timewise or economically as a single mom.>>I can't either. I'm sure the very rich single moms have at least one or more nannies and probably several other assistants as well.
poster:Sarah T.
thread:599531
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/social/20060115/msgs/599889.html