Posted by alexandra_k on December 2, 2005, at 15:00:46 [reposted on December 3, 2005, at 14:38:52 | original URL]
In reply to Re: ...addendum » linkadge, posted by alexandra_k on December 2, 2005, at 14:58:29
though...
you showed it to be deductively invalid...
and we already decided
(well, i did)
that it was more charitably interpreted as a inductive argument (where the majority of inductive arguments - and some inductively forceful arguments - are deductively invalid)
;-)
poster:alexandra_k
thread:585017
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/social/20051203/msgs/585041.html