Re: stupid F-ing DBT

Posted by Emily Elizabeth on September 30, 2005, at 16:14:53

In reply to Re: stupid F-ing DBT, posted by B2chica on September 30, 2005, at 12:26:50

I'm sorry to hear abt this whole situation. I think that the vagueness of it really is hard. Is there a way to re-negotiate the terms of the "contract" so that you will attend and be attentive (notice I did not say share) a certain number of sessions (maybe like 8?). That might be better than having to be there until someone decides that you have made progress. I wonder if that would satisfy them. I don't think that it helps anyone to have hostages at a group.
Best,
EE

Thread

stupid F-ing DBT ****S. TRIGGER**** B2chica 9/30/05
ooops, hehe i mean 5 words... (nm) B2chica 9/30/05
Re: stupid F-ing DBT ****S. TRIGGER**** » B2chica terrics 9/30/05
Re: stupid F-ing DBT ****S. TRIGGER**** B2chica 9/30/05
Re: stupid F-ing DBT B2chica 9/30/05
Re: stupid F-ing DBT ****S. TRIGGER**** rubenstein 9/30/05
Re: stupid F-ing DBT Emily Elizabeth 9/30/05
Re: stupid F-ing DBT ****S. TRIGGER**** lynn970 9/30/05
Re: stupid F-ing DBT ****S. TRIGGER**** » B2chica cubic_me 10/1/05
Re: stupid F-ing DBT ****S. TRIGGER**** » B2chica kerria 10/1/05
Re: stupid F-ing DBT » B2chica fallsfall 10/1/05
Re: stupid F-ing DBT rabidreader 10/3/05

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:Emily Elizabeth thread:561227
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/psycho/20050920/msgs/561323.html

	for
in