Posted by Lou Pilder on July 30, 2007, at 21:53:34 [reposted on August 6, 2007, at 22:49:32 | original URL]
In reply to Don't keep us in suspense, Lou, posted by greywolf on July 9, 2007, at 17:41:13
> My respectful suggestion, Lou, is that you simply lay out your treatise encompassing the twelve topics you detail above. Don't keep everyone in suspense, edify us.
>
> GreywolfGreywolf,
The saying,[...good for the community as a whole...] has been the banner for centuries to many leaders. What I am going to post here might be something that could be unbeknownst to many concerning the history of the motto,[...good for the community as a whole...].
I base this on that I may be one of a few people with background that has had me be trained as to know what the origin and history is concerning that motto.
I was trained and actually promoted the concept to others as it was practiced 800 years ago, in England. Nottingham, England.
That was not the first place that the concept was practiced, but that is where it was popularized in a particular form that spread throughout England and then to Canada and the US.
What I could write here in the form of education to the community, and for members to have a better understanding of this concept, could also possibly explain how fascism and National Socialism and other dictatorships were accepted by the country that was under a totalitarian leader. Does it be a wonder how those countries were able to be established under totalitarianism? I can explain that and I hope that people here could have a better understanding of this concept after they read what I would like to post here.
You see, many of those people in those countries under totalitarian rule innitially accepted that. Was not Hitler elected? What did he do to have that many people want him to be elected and to become der Feueher?
The concept of [...good for the community as a whole...] comes into play here. It was not new to Hitler of Moussolini or Stalin, for the concept is ancient. The concept is in many forms, for Jesus of Nazareth had a different concept to [...good for the community as a whole...]than Hitler or Mussolini or Stalin and other totalitarian dictators. And so did Dr. Martin Luther King jr and many others. But what is the difference that makes them different? I could show that.
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:774451
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/poli/20070708/msgs/774457.html