Psycho-Babble Politics | about politics | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

We perhaps not debate this anymore?

Posted by Meri-Tuuli on November 20, 2006, at 9:37:17

In reply to Re: What on earth?, posted by Meri-Tuuli on November 20, 2006, at 9:23:51

>100% correct useage is 3% per hundred women PER YEAR

Yes, but there's only a narrow window in a womans cycle when she can actually get pregnant. So, this figure is really alot less regarding pregnancies. I agree it doesn't prevent against STDs. And like I said before, there's the emergency pill. I agree, the onus is on the woman, but if they're in a stable long term relationship where these things are talked about....this isn't a problem really.

Anyway. We should probably not debate this further - I think I agree very broadly with what you're saying, but I personally don't agree with the emphasis on the negative aspects of sex, I mean, if we did that for everything we'd never get in a car, or a plane, or play football, or anything like that, if you see what I'm saying...

Kind regards

Meri


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Politics | Framed

poster:Meri-Tuuli thread:699389
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/poli/20061009/msgs/705488.html