Posted by rayww on February 26, 2005, at 12:55:05
In reply to Re: Political prophesy » rayww, posted by AuntieMel on February 26, 2005, at 10:08:46
I think I forgot to read the directions. Perhaps we could start with the George Washington prophecy and ignore all the rest in my other response. Washington's was very specific to the United States of America
I knew this would be difficult, which is why I hesitated to get into it. Strange, it only took me about three searches to find what I was looking for. Of course then the five minutes quickly grew to two hours becasue it was all so very interesting.
> I know no reason not to do that. I'm assuming you are talking about the prophesies that are believed to predict future worldly events.
>
> There should be no trouble as long as you start with one you believe pertinent and we keep the discussion limited to how this might fit in with current events.
>
> In other words - keep it as 'detached' as if we were discussing Nostradamus. And not make it a discussion of 'this is what I believe and all other interpretations are wrong'
>
> Just a reiteration - and for anyone else that may want to join in. I don't see you behaving that way anyway - at least not on purpose.
poster:rayww
thread:461623
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/poli/20050122/msgs/463752.html