Re: WMD-ception » AuntieMel

Posted by alexandra_k on January 15, 2005, at 20:53:09

In reply to Re: WMD-ception, posted by AuntieMel on January 13, 2005, at 14:09:03

> A reasonable person could have concluded that he did have weapons.
Hmph, what news do you watch? AMERICAN news by any chance? There was little question that that was just an EXCUSE to me...
>It is known that he did have them at one point, and wouldn't let inspectors in. It certainly reeked of him hiding something.
Yeah, but I thought the conclusion you reached would have been fairly obvious right from the start.

Thread

WMD-ception Toph 1/12/05
Re: WMD-ception AuntieMel 1/13/05
Re: WMD-ception Toph 1/13/05
Re: WMD-ception » Toph TofuEmmy 1/13/05
Re: WMD-ception » TofuEmmy Toph 1/13/05
Re: WMD-ception TofuEmmy 1/13/05
Re: WMD-ception » AuntieMel alexandra_k 1/15/05
Re: WMD-ception gardenergirl 1/16/05
Re: WMD-ception alexandra_k 1/16/05
Re: WMD-ception » alexandra_k AuntieMel 1/17/05
Re: WMD-ception alexandra_k 1/17/05
Re: WMD-ception » alexandra_k AuntieMel 1/18/05
Re: WMD-ception » AuntieMel alexandra_k 1/18/05
Re: WMD-ception mike13 1/22/05

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:alexandra_k thread:441356
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/poli/20041129/msgs/442559.html

	for
in