Posted by alexandra_k on October 12, 2004, at 16:51:21
In reply to Re: 'Alternative' versus 'complimentary', posted by Dr. Bob on October 12, 2004, at 2:59:27
> > What about just 'complementary' though?
>
> I suppose either could have been used to include the other... Do you think it's worth changing at this point?
>
> BobI'm not too bothered actually. I just thought that 'complimentary' was a weaker claim than 'alternative', but I don't suppose it matters really. I was just curious about why you picked that one.
poster:alexandra_k
thread:400106
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20041012/msgs/402250.html