Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Civility

Posted by Dr. Bob on October 28, 2003, at 23:52:08

In reply to Civility Standard Dr. Bob, posted by Susan J on October 28, 2003, at 10:04:25

> > > I hate what you did. I really hate what you did.
>
> I used I statements, and I wasn't exaggerating. More confusion.
>
> Lar

> I am confused too. I would think that "I hate you" would be uncivil but "I hate what you did" would not be. The latter makes a definite point of distinguish between the *behavior* and the *person*.
>
> Michael

> I thought it was a supportive statement of Kristen, validating her value as a human being, yet correctly stating certain behavior bothered Larry. If he can't say that, how can bad behavior ... ever be addressed?
>
> Susan

Yes, it's definitely more civil to say you hate what someone did than you hate them. But why even say you hate what they did? It's fine to give someone feedback as long as its constructive. How constructive is it to say you hate what they did?

Would I feel supported if someone said they hated what I did? No.


> > > this post ... comes across like emotional blackmail.
>
> I don't consider my statement to be an accusation. An accusation would be 'You are using emotional blackmail.' What I said is feedback about how her post might be read.
>
> Tabitha

1. IMO, that isn't feedback about how her post might be read, but how it does read.

2. As above, yes, it's more civil than some alternatives. But it's not constructive. Or an I statement. I wouldn't feel supported if someone said my post came across like emotional blackmail.


> If the *civility* standard is so *restrictive* that people cannot communicate effectively, perhaps it's truly time to modify it.

The whole point of the civility standard is to be restrictive. To restrict communication of certain types.

> As an attorney, my view on the law in general, is that it's a *tool* that serves the good of the people, and that people do not serve the *law.* ... Analogous to that, then, the civility standard here must serve the good of the posters
>
> Susan

The purpose of the civility standard is in fact to serve the good of the community. By maintaining a supportive atmosphere. But that means restricting the freedom of some individuals at some times.

Bob


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Dr. Bob thread:274133
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20031008/msgs/274499.html