Re: less than factual info and ratings

Posted by BrittPark on December 28, 2002, at 21:09:31

In reply to Re: less than factual info and ratings, posted by Mitchell on December 28, 2002, at 19:31:17

From the responses I'm getting I think we can conclude that rating would not be appreciated. However in other areas peer rating works rather well. Take a look at slashdot.org.
Cheers and Suggestion Tabled,
Britt

Thread

Poster qualifications. Dr. Bob BrittPark 12/27/02
Re: Poster ratings Dr. Bob 12/27/02
Re: Poster ratings » Dr. Bob Dinah 12/27/02
Re: Poster ratings » Dinah BrittPark 12/27/02
Re: less than factual info and ratings » BrittPark IsoM 12/27/02
Re: less than factual info and ratings Mitchell 12/28/02
Re: less than factual info and ratings BrittPark 12/28/02
Re: Poster ratings Dr. Bob 12/29/02
Re: Poster ratings BrittPark 12/29/02
Re: Poster ratings » Dr. Bob Dinah 12/29/02
Rating by number of posts » Dr. Bob IsoM 12/30/02
Re: Rating by number of posts - Part 1 Jonathan 12/30/02
Re: Rating by number of posts - Part 2 Jonathan 12/30/02
^^^^ Age level: 'bad ...' = 5, '... idea.' = 13.4 (nm) Jonathan 12/30/02
Re: Rating by number of posts - Part 1 Noa 1/1/03

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:BrittPark thread:8603
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20021128/msgs/8634.html

	for
in