Re: Poster ratings » Dr. Bob

Posted by Dinah on December 27, 2002, at 21:27:41

In reply to Re: Poster ratings, posted by Dr. Bob on December 27, 2002, at 21:21:14

I'm surprised you've given it serious thought, Dr. Bob, since you have always been in favor of this site being supportive. I can't imagine many less supportive things than being given a rating of "full of bull" or "not reliable" or something by your peers.
Surely it's better to just point out errors in fact without drawing conclusions about the poster of the erroneous facts.

Thread

Poster qualifications. Dr. Bob BrittPark 12/27/02
Re: Poster ratings Dr. Bob 12/27/02
Re: Poster ratings » Dr. Bob Dinah 12/27/02
Re: Poster ratings » Dinah BrittPark 12/27/02
Re: less than factual info and ratings » BrittPark IsoM 12/27/02
Re: less than factual info and ratings Mitchell 12/28/02
Re: less than factual info and ratings BrittPark 12/28/02
Re: Poster ratings Dr. Bob 12/29/02
Re: Poster ratings BrittPark 12/29/02
Re: Poster ratings » Dr. Bob Dinah 12/29/02
Rating by number of posts » Dr. Bob IsoM 12/30/02
Re: Rating by number of posts - Part 1 Jonathan 12/30/02
Re: Rating by number of posts - Part 2 Jonathan 12/30/02
^^^^ Age level: 'bad ...' = 5, '... idea.' = 13.4 (nm) Jonathan 12/30/02
Re: Rating by number of posts - Part 1 Noa 1/1/03

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:Dinah thread:8603
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20021128/msgs/8607.html

	for
in