![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 1 to 19 of 19. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by ed_uk on June 23, 2005, at 18:24:44
Hello,
I was wondering whether you'd had time to reconsider Larry's block, you mentioned that you would give it some thought.
Kind regards
~Ed
Posted by Phillipa on June 23, 2005, at 18:48:01
In reply to To Dr. Bob - Larry Hoover, posted by ed_uk on June 23, 2005, at 18:24:44
Dr. Bob we need Larry Hoover on the Alternative Board. Please update us with a reconsideration. Fondly, Phillipa
Posted by Jakeman on June 23, 2005, at 20:06:18
In reply to Re: To Dr. Bob - Larry Hoover » ed_uk, posted by Phillipa on June 23, 2005, at 18:48:01
> Dr. Bob we need Larry Hoover on the Alternative Board. Please update us with a reconsideration. Fondly, Phillipa
I would too. Thanks ~ Jake
Posted by TamaraJ on June 23, 2005, at 21:22:14
In reply to Re: To Dr. Bob - Larry Hoover, posted by Jakeman on June 23, 2005, at 20:06:18
I, too, would like to know what the status of the request is. Thanks.
Tamara
Posted by KaraS on June 24, 2005, at 4:27:53
In reply to To Dr. Bob - Larry Hoover, posted by ed_uk on June 23, 2005, at 18:24:44
Yes, please reconsider on the merits of the case not because of his popularity here.
K
Posted by Nickengland on June 24, 2005, at 17:47:26
In reply to To Dr. Bob - Larry Hoover, posted by ed_uk on June 23, 2005, at 18:24:44
It would be good to see Larry back in action on the alternative board again...I only mention alternative as for me persoanlly it was there he offered education there for me about fish oil with his vast knowledge on alternative treatments.
Its a shame he's not around, he has much to offer with support and education to others..
Kind regards
Nick
Posted by jay on June 25, 2005, at 23:25:09
In reply to To Dr. Bob - Larry Hoover, posted by ed_uk on June 23, 2005, at 18:24:44
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering whether you'd had time to reconsider Larry's block, you mentioned that you would give it some thought.
>
> Kind regards
>
> ~Ed
Yes Bob....you said you would reconsider...or think about it. You have had plenty of time, please tell!Jay
Posted by ed_uk on June 26, 2005, at 18:50:11
In reply to To Dr. Bob - Larry Hoover, posted by ed_uk on June 23, 2005, at 18:24:44
Hello,
Are you there? ;-)
~ed
Posted by rainbowbrite on June 26, 2005, at 21:23:08
In reply to Dr. Bob?, posted by ed_uk on June 26, 2005, at 18:50:11
i was just about to start a post asking if he was ok :-) but then I spotted him. Hi Bob!
Posted by Deneb on June 26, 2005, at 21:37:30
In reply to you read my mind!!, posted by rainbowbrite on June 26, 2005, at 21:23:08
> i was just about to start a post asking if he was ok :-) but then I spotted him. Hi Bob!
I was getting worried too. I worry that managing this place can be too stressful for one person.
Deneb
Posted by rainbowbrite on June 26, 2005, at 21:40:29
In reply to Re: Me too, was worried about Dr. Bob » rainbowbrite, posted by Deneb on June 26, 2005, at 21:37:30
I was thinking he must of taken off on another vacation and didnt tell us!! LOL :-0
Posted by Dinah on June 27, 2005, at 7:27:29
In reply to Re: Me too, was worried about Dr. Bob, posted by rainbowbrite on June 26, 2005, at 21:40:29
He was on the other boards. I guess he was enjoying the relative peace on Admin.
Posted by Nickengland on June 27, 2005, at 14:14:47
In reply to Re: Me too, was worried about Dr. Bob » rainbowbrite, posted by Dinah on June 27, 2005, at 7:27:29
He has been posting on this board...just not on this thread.
Is he building up the tension to the climax that Larry will be released...the suspense is rising lol
...To be continued ;-)
Posted by Dinah on June 27, 2005, at 17:29:21
In reply to Re: Me too, was worried about Dr. Bob, posted by Nickengland on June 27, 2005, at 14:14:47
He's ruled.
No clemency. :(
Posted by ed_uk on June 27, 2005, at 19:50:41
In reply to Re: Me too, was worried about Dr. Bob » Nickengland, posted by Dinah on June 27, 2005, at 17:29:21
Hi Dinah,
When did he rule? I didn't see. Can you post a link. Thank you :-)
Kind regards
~Ed
Posted by Dinah on June 27, 2005, at 19:56:54
In reply to Re: Me too, was worried about Dr. Bob » Dinah, posted by ed_uk on June 27, 2005, at 19:50:41
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050614/msgs/519681.html
While he might have been correct in his assumptions, I still think he could have come up with a different conclusion. :(
Posted by Dinah on June 27, 2005, at 22:26:01
In reply to Re: Me too, was worried about Dr. Bob » ed_uk, posted by Dinah on June 27, 2005, at 19:56:54
Hmmm...
I should have said his assumptions appear correct, as far as they go. But I don't think he is correctly factoring in lack of understanding of the rule.
Actually, I might like to propose that different types of infractions might start over at one week. Because the basis of long blocks is the assumption that people would learn over time what is and isn't allowable. But that doesn't necessarily translate into other types of violations. So someone who was blocked for a long period of time for giving information on the illegal import of drugs without prescription several times wouldn't necessarily understand the three post limit, and wouldn't be deliberately breaking the rules.
So that there could be more than one column per poster on the blocking spreadsheet.
Maybe I have overlooked something, but that seems more in keeping with the spirit of lengthy blocks to me.
Posted by alexandra_k on June 28, 2005, at 5:22:48
In reply to Re: Me too, was worried about Dr. Bob, posted by Dinah on June 27, 2005, at 22:26:01
> Actually, I might like to propose that different types of infractions might start over at one week. Because the basis of long blocks is the assumption that people would learn over time what is and isn't allowable. But that doesn't necessarily translate into other types of violations. So someone who was blocked for a long period of time for giving information on the illegal import of drugs without prescription several times wouldn't necessarily understand the three post limit, and wouldn't be deliberately breaking the rules.
> Maybe I have overlooked something, but that seems more in keeping with the spirit of lengthy blocks to me.
Yeah. I might be tempted to agree. With respect to 'technical' things like that. With respect to attacking / accusing other people... Well... I have to say that it took a while... But I have come around to the idea of lengthy blocks.
I've been worried about Bob too.
He seems to go all quiet sometimes.
I know he is busy...
But I worry about it when people are attacking him...
And when people are mad at him.
I know it is his job to deal with that...
But then it isn't really because he's not our p-doc...
And then even people whose job it is to deal with that sort of sh*t don't deal with it very well...
And I'd better shut up now.
:-(
Posted by ed_uk on June 28, 2005, at 5:45:12
In reply to Re: Me too, was worried about Dr. Bob » ed_uk, posted by Dinah on June 27, 2005, at 19:56:54
Hi Dinah,
>http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050614/msgs/519681.html
>While he might have been correct in his assumptions, I still think he could have come up with a different conclusion. :(
Thank you. I hadn't seen that post.
Kind regards
~ed
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.