Posted by caraher on August 24, 2007, at 21:52:15
In reply to Re: No. discrimination is discrimination » zazenducke, posted by fayeroe on August 23, 2007, at 21:34:03
I'm inclined to side with both sides. On one hand, I agree that "discrimination is discrimination" and there's nothing "reverse" about it. Oh, except that "reverse" is a handy label for cases of discrimination that reverse the usual power roles.
So it's at least a useful shorthand...
poster:caraher
thread:775922
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/poli/20070708/msgs/778437.html