Posted by Jay on April 2, 2007, at 11:29:55 [reposted on April 2, 2007, at 12:36:01 | original URL]
In reply to Re: Saw 'An Inconvenient Truth' today.. » Jay, posted by Michael83 on April 2, 2007, at 4:18:13
> Al Gore's movie is junk science. I believe in protecting the environment, but he does not know what he is talking about and stays true to his "green propaganda" like it was a religion.
>
> There is a good movie (albeit long, 75min) on YouTube (that was also shown on TV) that makes his movie look ridiculous.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XttV2C6B8pUGore's movie has more 'science' in it then most other movies on this topic, especially including this piece of propaganda from 'youtube' (Couldn't find a decent production house to back the trash?). Gore uses more then 187 different citations from prominent international scientists in his movie. With this, he uses, fact, charts based on fact, and solid data based on the research of the above scientists. Where are the citations, the world scientific leaders in this youtube piece of rubbish? Why is Gore getting an 'Oscar', praise from the scientific community, while this other piece of trash withers away on 'youtube.com'? The right have done this for a long time...they deny science for many reasons. Sometimes it's religious, other's it's to cover their own greed. I dare, implore, you to pull the data from Gore's movie and try to challenge it, using scientific methods. The problem is you can't..you can only come up with rhetoric and say..'no...it's not this way..'..with NIL evidence. Like Reagan and his 'Trees cause pollution' theory...and George Bush and his "There will be more owls and fewer jobs.." comment. Sick. Very, very sick. No care for the world for our children, just to line their greedy little pockets right now.
Jay
poster:Jay
thread:746268
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/poli/20070312/msgs/746271.html