Discussing the issues

Posted by Declan on March 17, 2006, at 2:07:27

In reply to Re: Here is what you said » wildcard11, posted by AuntieMel on March 10, 2006, at 9:32:44

Can we really do that here? Are, say, Noam Chomsky's views not offensive here?? They would have to be. Can anyone tell me how one might advance (say) a Chomskyite argument about US foreign policy without vioalating the civility rules?
Declan

Thread

Vermont calls for Bush impreachment zeugma 3/7/06
...
for wildcard zeugma 3/10/06
you are too sweet! (nm) » zeugma wildcard11 3/10/06
Re: blocked for week » zeugma Dr. Bob 3/11/06
Dr. Bob (((z))) wildcard11 3/11/06
Wildcard11 10derHeart 3/11/06
((((((((((((((((((z))))))))))))))))))) agent858 3/12/06
Re: Wildcard11 » 10derHeart Jakeman 3/12/06
Jakeman wildcard11 3/12/06
Re: blocked - question » Dr. Bob AuntieMel 3/13/06
Re: blocked - question » AuntieMel wildcard11 3/13/06
Re: ((((((((((((((((((z))))))))))))))))))) Damos 3/13/06
Re: a good way to post it Dr. Bob 3/13/06
Discussing the issues Declan 3/17/06
A better example Declan 3/17/06
I'd better leave it there then (nm) Declan 3/27/06

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:Declan thread:617262
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/poli/20060304/msgs/621224.html

	for
in