Psycho-Babble Politics | about politics | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: California Single-payer bill

Posted by gromit on August 28, 2005, at 10:48:28

In reply to Re: California Single-payer bill, posted by Abby on August 27, 2005, at 4:38:29

Hi Abby,

> Actually, I think that a lot of people prefer the Canadian system. France has a pretty good system too. Ours is the most expensive and is ranked 30th or so. I'm pretty sure that under CHIS you could pay cashfor services that aren't covered.

Well people usually don't go on the internet and proclaim how great their coverage, meds or whatever are. You're probably right. But why would I want to pay cash for services that are covered under my current plan?

> The goal of the plan is to make sure that everyone has coverage, to improve the lot of those who are now on Medicaid, to provide Seniors w/ a better prescription drug benefit etc.

All good things that should be done.

> I don't want to fight with anyone on this board, but tell me what you like about the current system. I see one that's hugely dysfunctional a mess of patchwork programs and with no guarantees of coverage for mental health. (If you're covered by your employer, check whether the plan is self-insured, cause if it is ERISA pre-emption means that state regulation of benefits is prohibited, and since the Federal government has declined to regulate in amy way, your employer-provided benefits are what they say---and they can change at any time.)

The current system is screwed up, but for the time being I have good coverage. No need for fighting, I can agree to disagree.

> I'm not happy with the system we have now, but I'd like to know what you like about it, and why you don't think we could have radical reform and preserve the best features of our system.

Yeah, but from my reading it doesn't really preserve the best features. My problem is under this plan everyone would have CHIS, period. While that would be a big improvement for many it's likely it would mean less benefits for MY family. Why prohibit companies from selling possibly better insurance plans? If an employer wants to offer awesome benefits as an incentive why is that a bad thing? Why not help the people who could use help and leave the rest of us alone? That is what I see wrong with this bill.

I've been uninsured, under-insured, I've been to the county hospital many times, saw the county pdocs etc. The system sucks, no doubt about it. Raise taxes to pay for it, that's fine, just don't force me to participate when for once I have better options.


Rick


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


[547582]

Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Politics | Framed

poster:gromit thread:545049
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/poli/20050728/msgs/547582.html