Posted by happyflower on June 13, 2005, at 18:32:29
In reply to Michael Jackson acquitted, posted by partlycloudy on June 13, 2005, at 16:26:32
So cool, another board I didn't notice before! I might stay here! lol I love to debate! Heehee. As far as MJ goes, I think he is a big target for people because he acts and looks so weird and he (was) rich.
But I think people are forming their opinion on that one interview without actually seeing the whole thing. I sae the whole thing and afterwards the news were adding their own slant to it to make it look very negative.
The thing I am talking about is taking kids to bed. I don't believe he meant it in a sexual way. I believe they were just watching movies and having like a slumber party. But I wouldn't let my kids do that with a grown man anyways, but we let our kids come to our bed to snuggle and watch TV. I think MJ just needs to a little less nieve and not let it happen. I think he loves kids ( not sexually) and he wants to relive his childhood doing all the fun stuff he didn't get to do. I was going to accept whatever the verdict was, but if he was guilty, shouldn't he have been at least charged with something by now? I guess he only knows, but I wouldn't take the chance if I was a parent. I am leary of anyone who wants to be close to my kids.
poster:happyflower
thread:512145
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/poli/20050509/msgs/512220.html