Re: possible faulty assumption???

Posted by alexandra_k on May 27, 2005, at 17:25:32

In reply to Re: possible faulty assumption??? » AuntieMel, posted by alexandra_k on May 27, 2005, at 17:23:48

Auntiemel
Oh
By the way.
Your confusion was understandable.
I was getting a little confused.
What I said was a little confusing...
You had a good point.
I was squirming a bit there...
It really can be hard to express stuff clearly sometimes.
:-)

Thread

Internet Hunting alexandra_k 5/15/05
...
Re: Yeah, I think thats probably right » Camille Dumont alexandra_k 5/27/05
Re: I first encountered these arguments... alexandra_k 5/27/05
Re: Actually - I shouldn't have posted that alexandra_k 5/27/05
Re: I first encountered these arguments... so 5/27/05
y pudo demandar el título... (nm) so 5/27/05
Re: I'm sorry.. » so alexandra_k 5/27/05
Re: I'm sorry.. so 5/27/05
Re: possible faulty assumption??? » alexandra_k AuntieMel 5/27/05
Re: possible faulty assumption??? » AuntieMel Gabbi-x-2 5/27/05
Re: possible faulty assumption??? » Gabbi-x-2 AuntieMel 5/27/05
Re: I'm sorry.. » so alexandra_k 5/27/05
Re: possible faulty assumption??? » AuntieMel alexandra_k 5/27/05
Re: possible faulty assumption??? alexandra_k 5/27/05
Re: possible faulty assumption??? so 5/27/05
Re: possible faulty assumption??? so 5/27/05
Re: possible faulty assumption??? » so alexandra_k 5/28/05
Re: possible faulty assumption??? alexandra_k 5/28/05
Re: possible faulty assumption??? so 5/28/05
Re: please be civil » gromit » Camille Dumont Dr. Bob 5/29/05

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:alexandra_k thread:498173
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/poli/20050509/msgs/503803.html

	for
in