Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Lou's respone-wairizdahattak?

Posted by Lou Pilder on November 11, 2014, at 21:47:42

In reply to Re: why Lou isn't blocked » Dr. Bob, posted by SLS on November 11, 2014, at 19:16:00

> > > I just wonder, why isn't Lou blocked? ... His first post to me scared me, and I can see how a new member might not post again with his responses.
> > >
> > > I'm greatly saddened by it.
>
> > Sorry about not replying more promptly.
> >
> > I'd feel sad, too, if feeling scared kept people from posting. In this case, yes, I could block one trigger. (And I plan to add a Refuge board that would be more safe/less tolerant.) In general, however, it's impossible just to do away with triggers. My idea is that support and encouragement might help counteract fear. How were you able to overcome feeling scared and post again?
> >
> > Bob
>
>
> "Why Lou isn't blocked"
>
> Why is Twinleaf blocked?
>
> If personal attacks are to be sanctioned, why, then, did you not block Lou Pilder when he attacked me personally?
>
> Allow all triggers because it is impossible to sanction all triggers?
>
> It seems to me that the only person who might have been triggered by Twinleaf is you.
>
>
> - Scott

Friends,
It is written here,[...he attacked me personally...].
Now I am the subject person, again, here. And the subject is an attack against the poster that has used me as his subject person claiming some sort of attack against him.
Now the attack is not specified here so readers could think anything that I have written could constitute this personal attack. It could be that I am different from him but my different point of view is not an attck on him. Or it could be that I do not think that it is supportive to advise readers to take a combination of drugs that could kill them or addict them or give them a life-ruining condition. That is not an attack on Scott. Or it could be my stance that children reading here could think that it is supportive to take drugs that could cause them to kill themselves and/or others and I am trying to show them facts so that them and their parents could make a more-informed decision as to take these drugs or not. That is not an attack on Scott. Or it could be that I am tring to stop Mr. Hsiung and any deputy doing his wishes to let antisemitic propaganda remain to be seen here as supportive where it is originally posted. That is not an attack on Scott. Or it could be that I am also trying to stop Mr. Hsiung from allowing defamation toward me to be seen as supportive. That is not an attack on Scott.
What I am askiing readers here to do is to understand that there are prohibitions posted to me here by Mr. Hsiung that prevent me from posting my own repudiations to antisemitic statements and defamation against me here where those statements are originally posted. And for you to understand that there are years of outstanding notifications from me that if they were acted on , posters IMHO, would not ask why I am not blocked here and I do not know where any attack by me is toward the poster here.
Lou

 

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Lou Pilder thread:1073111
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140902/msgs/1073384.html