Posted by Lou Pilder on July 5, 2014, at 21:49:19
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-opper » Lou Pilder, posted by SLS on July 3, 2014, at 14:35:42
> > > I am relieved to know that you have never accused Dinah of fostering antisemitism, whether by action or inaction. It would be nice if you could reassure her of this.
> > >
> > >
> > > - Scott
> >
> > Scott,
> > You wrote,[...you have never accused Dinah of fostering anti-Semitism...reassure her of this...].
>
> > I have offered her the opportunity to post a link to any post that she thinks accuses her of fostering anti-Semitism
>
> Is it accurate to say that you have never accused Dinah of fostering antisemitism by including her in a group of people that you have accused of fostering antisemitism?
>
>
> - ScottScott,
The deputies had the opportunity to discuss notifications and Mr. Hsiung has stated to consider any reply as coming from all of us.
On top of that, Mr. Hsiung says that he will either post in the thread or contact the requester of notifications , except for some of mine. He then says that he is doing that because it may be good for him and the community as a whole for him to ignore my notification.
But how can he leave my notifications outstanding if the deputies could act without his permission if they wanted to? And why could it be good for him to ignore my requests in the notifications? What is this "good" that could come from ignoring my notifications, if you know?
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:1067704
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140304/msgs/1067955.html