Posted by Lou Pilder on June 25, 2012, at 19:40:52
In reply to Lou's reply-dahtzgud » Phillipa, posted by Lou Pilder on June 25, 2012, at 19:29:55
> > It's always been my understanding that to contact Dr Bob the correct proceedure was to post first on admin. Also to write to him directly. Since that one link from 2006 does state that unless rule of three applies that a reponse should be received to the request. To my way of thinking this would be a private babblemail from Bob. I have no way of knowing if any was ever received by Lou. I personally in the past did receive babblemails to answer a question. But if the post in question didn't get some diciplinary action. Personally I'd agree that the post was okay with Dr. Bob. As for antisemetic. Sorry I just don't buy into this. My personal feelings. Phillipa
>
> Phillipa,
> You wtote,[...unless (the) rule of three applies that a response should be received to the request...].
> Thanks, I think that's good
> LouPhillipa,
I am unsure as to what you are wanting to mean in the grammatical structure that can be seen. Here is what I do not understand and if you could post more to clarify, that could give me the opportunity to post a response.
Lou
[...I agree that the post was OK with (Mr Hsiung). As for antisemitic. Sorry, I just don't buy into this.]
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:1019988
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20120228/msgs/1020214.html