Posted by Lou Pilder on June 20, 2011, at 16:20:19
In reply to Re: To Lou: a request » 10derheart, posted by SLS on June 19, 2011, at 6:08:01
> > It's ok. I'll forget it, I'm sure. Ot think of another way to look at it.
>
> I am very happy that you asserted yourself so convincingly. I think it was very important that you verbalized your concerns using the interjection of facts. I would not recommend to you that you ignore anyone's posts in particular. As for me, I tend to disconnect myself from posts and posters whom have consistently upset me. In other words, I usually ignore these people and offer very little respect for their words. I usually avoid emotional entanglement this way.
>
> Re: 3-post rule:
>
> The need for a 3-post rule was flushed out by the behavior of one person. It occurs often that one person will demonstrate a weakness in a system such that change becomes necessary. What's wrong with that?
>
>
> - ScottScott,
I am unsure as to what you are wanting to mean in some of your post here. If you could post answers to the following, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
A. What are you wanting to mean by {flushed out}?
B. What was the behavior of the one person?
C. What was the weakness in the system?
D. In {what's wrong with that}, what is the {that}?
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:984958
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20110117/msgs/988891.html