Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: overgeneralizations are still uncivil » Dr. Bob

Posted by glydin 2010 on June 26, 2010, at 18:27:38

In reply to Re: overgeneralizations are still uncivil, posted by Dr. Bob on June 26, 2010, at 0:51:10

I appreciate you responding. Since this is an area to ask questions, I would like to pose the following for clarification purposes as to what you would see as a sweeping statement...

IF a poster were to post:

"This _______ (insert med, med class, treatment) is____________!"

1) crap
2) sh*t
3) worthless
4) damaging
5) not for any human
6) never works

is that example sweeping?

I could name others but I think you get the picture..... I hope you keep in mind truth is not the issue I'm inquiring about. Also, please keep in mind the lack of wording for IMO or "feeling statements". This question is about civility and to some degree, sensitivity to other's opinions and experiences.

Not to be lost is I also do not consider the sweeping statements that certain treatments are great, always work and should be used by all to be allowable either.


Recovery - 5 years

 

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:glydin 2010 thread:951974
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20100321/msgs/952292.html