Posted by Lou Pilder on July 5, 2009, at 13:48:32
In reply to Re: Lou's request for clarification » Lou Pilder, posted by Dinah on July 5, 2009, at 11:33:20
> We'll get back to you as soon as possible.
Dinah,
You wrote,[...as soon as possible...].
I am unnsure as to what your reply to me could mean. This is because I do not know what in your thinking {possible] could mean. If you could list the criteria that make it possible, along with the criteria that make it not possible, then I could have the clarification that I am seeking so that I could understand what you are wanting to mean here and post a response in accordance with the facts known.
LouFriends,
If you are interested in this ongoing situation, I invite by email to show you the rest of what this ongoing situation involves. Then you could have more infomation IMO to make your own determination as to
You could also make your own determination IMO concerning the standards here and I could show you what other psychiatrsts/psychologists say concerning the use of standards in a community, in particular but not limited to, the standard that a time delay is significant as posted by an administrator here.
If you do not believe in what I have been posting and/or do not want to email, then reject this opportunity now. But if you do believe in what I have been writing about and could email me, please accept this opportunity to know what may be unbeknownst to you now.
Lou
lpilder_1188@fuse.net
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:904920
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20090529/msgs/905096.html