No, I suppose it's not. » Partlycloudy

Posted by gardenergirl on January 2, 2009, at 13:48:38

In reply to Re: I don't think that's ever been the claim here » gardenergirl, posted by Partlycloudy on January 2, 2009, at 7:01:04

I'm sorry for distracting from your thread. I should have, at the very least, changed the subject line since I was responding to a specific, tangential post. Better still would have been to start my own thread or just be silly to myself. I'll try to be more aware of the whole and the situation in the future instead of blurting, something I still need to work on.
With regret,
gg

Thread

Orneriness not compatible with the boards. Partlycloudy 12/15/08
...
Thank you » Racer lucie lu 12/16/08
Lou's request for members to consider-mizdnotif Lou Pilder 12/16/08
Re: I don't think that's ever been the claim here » Racer Kath 12/16/08
Re: I don't think that's ever been the claim here ron1953 12/27/08
Re: I don't think that's ever been the claim here » ron1953 gardenergirl 12/28/08
Re: I don't think that's ever been the claim here fayeroe 12/28/08
Re: I don't think that's ever been the claim here » ron1953 Dinah 12/28/08
:-) muffled 12/28/08
Re: :-) » muffled 10derHeart 12/28/08
Re: I don't think that's ever been the claim here » fayeroe gardenergirl 12/30/08
Re: I don't think that's ever been the claim here gardenergirl 1/1/09
Re: I don't think that's ever been the claim here » gardenergirl Partlycloudy 1/2/09
No, I suppose it's not. » Partlycloudy gardenergirl 1/2/09

Post a new follow-up

[871940]

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:gardenergirl thread:868896
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20081228/msgs/871940.html