Posted by fayeroe on March 26, 2008, at 8:31:56
>************ The general idea (there might be exceptions) would be that if no one notified us about something, we'd consider it OK with everyone, and if something was OK with everyone, then it would be OK with us. If posters thought something was overlooked, they would be empowered to notify us. And it would be their responsibility to do so.
>
> BobBut the "no one" and "everyone" and "posters" would include current and former deputies, right?
I'm not sure why you think it is good for the community to know that if you get PBC'd, it's because a fellow poster turned you in.
I have any number of other reservations about the idea.*****************************
I took an entire post, so I won't take one sentence out of it and confuse anyone.I keep seeing statements or questions such as the one below concerning "former deputies"...
>>>>But the "no one" and "everyone" and "posters" would include current and former deputies, right?<<<<<
I have been curious for a long time about "former deputies" and I want to know if there is a distinction between a "former deputy" and a "poster"?
I see "former deputies" mentioned fairly often here.
Is a former deputy allowed authority or privileges that "posters" aren't?
I thought that the position is such that a person served for a certain amount of time (pass the job around) and then they went back to being a poster, just like the rest of us.Is this "once in grace, always in grace"?
poster:fayeroe
thread:819960
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080313/msgs/819960.html