Posted by Muffled on November 21, 2007, at 23:57:48
In reply to Re: Why not be? Why be? Why not? Why? » gardenergirl, posted by ClearSkies on November 21, 2007, at 15:36:22
well from my perspective, i don't really get it either...
I CAN see as how it potentially could be taken wrong, but it didn't appaer to be.
Then later another poster kinda riled it up I'm afraid... then up to the point of cyber yelling....but that was not addressed? I don't wish to speak ill of anyone, but truly...I don't understand how one potential problem was addressed w/o the other also being addressed...
Its 'just' a civility reminder I guess, but I am also confused somewhat and would also like to understand the reasoning here...
I think the whole thing would have blown over except for it being fired up...
thanks
M
poster:Muffled
thread:796381
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20071106/msgs/796486.html