Posted by Lou Pilder on July 4, 2007, at 6:57:28
D. Hsiung,
In accordance with your procedure to keep reminding you, I requested clarification in regards to your policy here and rationales and actions you have taken that you write are fine to discuss here.
In review, I have requested clarification for I am unsure as to what you are wanting to mean here in regards to that you write that if I was to post ;
[..my faith says (that I) XXX (the foundation of Jewdaism)...], that that would not be OK to post here. You have also posted that if I was to post ,[...said to me XXX, (the foundation of Jewdaism)...], that that would be uncivil to you here.
Looking at my request on June 23...
A.If it is not OK to post [{my faith says}XXX(which is the foundation of Jewdaism], I had requested that you clarify as to if it is that part;
1.{my faith says} or
2.[the foundation of Jewdaism]
that is not OK to post here or something else that makes the statement not OK to you to post here.
Your reply to me was;
[...That should be OK...]
I am unsure after reading your reply to me as to how your reply answers my question for clarification for your rule for the faith forum writes that it is not OK to post;
[My faith says (that I)XXX (the foundation of Jewdaism)...]
If you could clarify this for me, as to that you have written that it is not OK in your policy on the faith forum, but you write here that it is OK, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
Lou Pilder
Here is a link to a request of mine to you where these requests for clarification by me are included.
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070605/msgs/765175.html
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:767548
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070702/msgs/767548.html