Posted by one woman cine on May 10, 2007, at 11:13:19
In reply to Re: perhaps, more importantly - » one woman cine, posted by Dinah on May 10, 2007, at 11:08:49
I understand that. Completely.
But what gg touched on was secrecy and relief at speaking about something that resonates for her (& others I suspect) strongly.
Why was she prevented from articulating this previously? (rhetorical question - don't answer, please)
Why are criticisms of babble workings/decisions silenced or perceived to be silenced?
I guess this is a bigger question than what's civil/what's not scenario.
True, civility needs to be strived for, but there's also a balance.
Not to say that all is malicious intent or any. I don't know. But I have a deep distrust of people who say they have best interests in mind, when in fact - actions prove otherwise.
poster:one woman cine
thread:756918
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070423/msgs/757437.html