Posted by fayeroe on May 10, 2007, at 8:09:08
In reply to Ok to be uncivil to Dr. Bob? » gardenergirl, posted by greywolf on May 10, 2007, at 5:45:28
> C'mon. I'm all in favor of being careful with the rules, and I've repeatedly spoken out in support of the deputies who, imho, are doing a fine job overall.
>
> But where did this "more leniency for incivility to Dr. Bob" standard come from? This is "civil" within the context of the site's rules?:after all of the years of Bob not being CIVIL to the posters/deputies, by too many examples that i care to list for you here, i think GG can say whatever the hell she wants to about and for him. i've been here longer than you and seen so mighty strange deals that he's pulled.
>
> "How absolutely shameful and self-centered.how shameful and self-centered is it to answer an unwitting and vulnerable poster's serious question with a question?
>
> (Belated note to self: Duh! Why in the world would someone with this personality type give a rat's *ss? Rolls eyes and shakes head at the rampant idealism.)
>
> It's true this is finger-pointing and accusing. There is no hedging or compassion for whatever internal state is driving the narcissism."we can't see Bob's hands. maybe he points fingers too.
>
> So, calling Dr. Bob out as a shameful and self-centered narcissist is not uncivil? In comparison to so many PBCs I've seen, that's remarkable. While Dr. Bob might be more tolerant of criticism directed toward him, does such forbearance justify intentionally demeaning character attacks?i've seen worse here.............
>
> Civility is civility, end of story. The standards should not be variable.and history is history.
fayeroe
poster:fayeroe
thread:756918
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070423/msgs/757370.html