Posted by Lou Pilder on March 25, 2007, at 7:51:20
DR. Hsiung,
In response to your invitation here that it is fine to discuss your actions or policy here,and to ask for your rationales for such,the following.
My concern now is the rule made here that says something like that one can not post more than 3 consecutive follow-ups in a thread and that there are exceptions to that rule here. I would like this discussion to keep in mind the rationale stated in your TOS/FAQ as to the conception of the rule as something like the following:
More than 3 consecutive posts;
A.may discourage >less confident posters< from joining in
B.gives them more of a >chance<
C.makes it easier for them to {help}
D.they can {feel good} doing so.
Then there are exceptions listed. The exception that I am requesting clarification for is:
[...Responding to earlier posts{one at a time}...] My next post wil go into my request for clarification to you concerning that exception here.
Lou Pilder
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:744075
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070304/msgs/744075.html