Posted by Lou PIlder on February 9, 2007, at 16:03:15
In reply to Lou, posted by kid47 on February 9, 2007, at 10:54:34
> Hey Lou. What about notiyfing the administration again. Then possibly post here that you have notified the administration on such and such a date and time concerning this matter. That would sort of make it public record. It would of course be good if the administration would then aknowledge receipt of your notification.....either personally or here if you wish. Just a thought to cut down on some of the rehashing.
>
> Peace my friend
>
> kidKid47,
In my replies to Honore in this thread, you could find some other aspects of my concerns in regards to the notification feature here.
I would like for you to examine those replies from me to him/her and his/her statements to me and if you could, to ask yourself the following:
A. Are there two standards by the administration in regards to a member using the notification feature in receiving a reply from them ?
B. Is there an additional step to me to have a reply from them?
C. Has the administration acknowledged that they have or have not confirmed that I have sent the notification in question? If you se such a confirmation, could you post it here in this thread?
D. In one of Honore's posts, does he/she write something like that perhaps Dr. Hsiung (and I guess all 6 deputies) have somehow missed it and are not imposing a different standard to you to write to you to send it again? And did I not write back to Honore something like that if it is the case if Dr. Hsiung,(and I guess all 6 deputies) have not missed it that thearfore then that there could be two standards by writing to me to send it again?
E. Have I not posted that I am requesting to Dr. Hsiung to clarify as to if he is saying that he did or did not receive the notification in question from me and that if I had the confirmation either way from him that I could either send it again or respond accordingly?
I am awaiting a reply from Dr. Hsiung or any deputy to confirm or to not confirm that I sent the notification using the proper procedure.
There is also my concern here about the additional procedure by the deputy for members that have not received a response to their sending of a notification, since now there is a post below this thread where a member writes to the administration to check a notification and then the member writes back a thank you. That could mean that that member had his/her notification replied to without sending it again. If that be the case here, then could that mean that there are or are not two standards here and if there are not, what could be a differentiating aspect for one request to check a notification being responded to, if it was responded to as per the thank you that followed in the thread, and my request to check the notification not being responded to unless I send it again? I guess that one reason could be if they are saying that they did not receive it from me, and that is the clarification that I am requesting from Dr. Hsiung and the deputies, for does not the notification goes to all of them?
There is also my concern about the policy of the 3 notification rule that could come into this discussion if I receve a reply from Dr. Hsiung either confirming or not that he did or did not receive my notification to him in question here.
If there are two standards here in relation to this concern of mine, so that the notification that I have sent will not be respnded to by the administration in the same manner as other's notifications, in relation that if I do not resend the notification it will not be either addressed in the thread where it is posted or that I will receive a reply by email, then if that would be having two standards, in your opinons, could the having of two standards have the potential to lead that one that is subjected to the additional step to feel put down? And is it not an unsound mental-health practice to put someone down?
Lou
poster:Lou PIlder
thread:726277
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070123/msgs/731451.html