Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: related questions » Dr. Bob

Posted by Dinah on January 25, 2007, at 9:42:00

In reply to Re: related questions, posted by Dr. Bob on January 25, 2007, at 0:28:39

> Well, I don't know about "always". For example, what about:
>
> > I felt harassed by Elaine.
>
> Bob

Does it make a sentence civil to merely leave the subject implied rather than directly stated? So that in the same post "I felt harassed" would be an ok statement about an internal state while "I felt harassed by xxx." would not be a reference to an internal state? It would seem pretty easy to drop the subject, not name names, but still be conveying exactly the same thing.

http://m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=harassed

Perhaps modern common useage of the word "harassed" is guiding my understanding here. But as Elaine pointed out, "I felt unheard" sound like a perfectly civil "I" statement while "I felt ignored" does not appear to me to have the same meaning since "I felt ignored" sounds as if there is an implied subject. I admit it's better than "I've been ignored." But ignored doesn't sound like an internal state, it sounds like.... oooh, I need my husband. Grammar is his hobby. Something about verbs?

Is there some sort of SAT exam answer to

Unheard is to ignored as xxxx is to harassed?

 

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Dinah thread:724954
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070123/msgs/726297.html