Posted by ElaineM on January 23, 2007, at 11:37:36
In reply to Re: on reporting a post » ElaineM, posted by Dinah on January 23, 2007, at 10:58:08
I guess Bob can respond to the "does a rejection contain an explanation" part of the question too.
Cause if we're not allowed to talk about requests on the board, or ask how, or why rules are or aren't applied, then I thought perhaps keeping it "out of the public" would result in more information being exchanged, and clarification -- which is all most of us want. Well, what I want.
If we can't get concrete feedback even through the new "submit a post" rule then there's no way to get that. I'm trying to see how keeping things off-board can still keep communication lines open, and not limit the exchange of information. Plus, I wouldn't want to put time into something if it could be arbitrarily erased from an inbox without an explanation - you know?
I just want stuff to be clear.Sorry, I'm gonna be a b*tch and ask another question :( [I think I'm gonna have to ask alot today] but...
This may have been discussed before, but is there a vague timeline for requests we send (or deputies forward) to Bob to be addressed by. It doesn't have to be exact, I'd just want to be able to tell that something was still underconsideration, or if it had somehow been mistakenly overlooked or something. (I haven't sent anything now - but for future reference) [you can link me if a sorta "response time" has been decided before]
thanks, El
poster:ElaineM
thread:725450
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070123/msgs/725534.html