Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Lou's reply to Dr. Hiung's reply to Lou » Dr. Bob

Posted by Lou Pilder on December 25, 2006, at 9:06:37

In reply to Re: Lou's request, posted by Dr. Bob on December 23, 2006, at 15:17:24

> > appeals are unlikely because the appeal can only go to the the maker of the post and could be unlikely to overrule himself.
>
> He could be. So there could be feelings of disempowerment?
>
> Bob

DR. Hsiung,
Your reply to me is a question and an answer to one part,(L), of my request to you for clarification. Your answer,[...He could be...], could fit part (L) of my request, but I do not see how it answers the following part of my request for clarification.
My requests were for clarification of my request as to your policy concerning the reply given to those that use the {report this post} feature here as to your previous reply to me,[...consider the reply {from all of us}...].
I am unsure as to what your reply means and I asked if the reply means that it is always that all the deputies and you thought the same as to if the post was civil or not. In your reply in this thread, if your answer,{He could be.}answers my question, I do not understand how it does because I can not see how it says that either all of the deputies and you {thought the same} as to if the post was civil or not.
As to your then asking me a question, I do not undertand how if I replied to you about your question to me as to how that could then facilitate an answer from you that could tell me as to if you and the deputies {think the same } in your determination of the post in question. If you could clarify that, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
Also, I had asked you that by you writing,{..consider the reply from all of us...} what that meant as to if your reply could mean that ther may have been deputies that dissented from your thinking, but the deputies have to be subordinate to your thinking and if that is why you wrote that I consider that the reply is from >all< of us even if some deputies dissented.. In examining your reply to me, I do not understand how your reply,{He could be} answers my question. And in regards to your question to me,{...so the could be feelings of disempowerment...?}, I do not know how if I did answer to you about that ow that could then facilitate an answer from you as to my request for clarification of what I had asked.
Also, The part about your use of quotation marks, I will consider separately as I do not undertand how your reply to me, {He could be}answers my request (A thru S) in the following post requesting clarification of such:
Lou Pilder
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061202/msgs/715846.html

 

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Lou Pilder thread:715846
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061202/msgs/716280.html