Posted by Lou Pilder on December 7, 2006, at 19:24:46
In reply to Lou's request to DR. Hsiung-C, posted by Lou Pilder on December 7, 2006, at 16:38:15
Dr. Hsiung,
If you are going to respond to my request here, I would like for you to consider the following.
There is the question here as to if your request to me is also a {requirement). I think that it is, for your request to others to rephrase a post is a requirement, not something that can be ignored.
So I consider your request to me to send it to someone else first, to be also in that mode. That is why I am asking you for clarification. It is because there could be two ways by some members here to look at your request to me and I am unsure as to if you are rescinding your request to me or not as a requirement for me to send you the post in advance for a determination for acceptability.
There are others here that think that your request to me could be ignored by me. I can understand their thinking that, for the deputy/member writes that you would not know if I asked someone else first or not.
But I have a higher standard to consider, and in the past I have rejected other's offers to circumvent your rules, and I do not want to circumvent this rule here in question,if it is a rule.
I do not want to send the post to you and give you the false impression that I have asked someone else first. I am asking for your review and only your review of the post in question, for your TOS writes that members can always send posts to you in advance, and I am a member here like others and do not want any additional terms or conditions made to me that others are not subjected to.
Lou Pilder
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:711220
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061202/msgs/711266.html