Posted by Lou Pilder on August 19, 2006, at 9:17:55
In reply to What Lou is asking for, posted by Lou Pilder on August 19, 2006, at 8:53:46
Friends,
Let us reason together. Would Dr. Hsiung be allowed to have a banner above the door to his classroom at the university, if he has a classroom, to read, "He that does not honour the Son does not honour the Father"?, or "You must believe in Jesus and that he was slain by the Jews"?
Well, I do not think so. For this went to the U.S Supreme court in "Bob Jones University" . This case gave the courts opinion as to if a university, even private, could have a racist doctrine. This was an IRS decision, but there are principles invoved in the case that carry to other aspects of universitys. One is if a univerity can promote what is "not in the public's interest".(the issue in "Bob Jones" was if they could exclude or bar students from enrolloing if they held that a white women could marry a black man). So the court decided that racism in Bob Jones university was not in the public's interst, even though it was a private school. You can read the decision with a search for such.
But that is only one case involving universitys in relation to racial and religious equality. The issue here is if the forum can restrain the Jewish poster from posting the foundation if Judaism,which is the Jewish perpective, while allowing the foundation of Christianity, which is the Christian perspevtive, to be posted without restraint.
Lou
lpilder_1188@fuse.net
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:678031
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060802/msgs/678036.html