Posted by Lou Pilder on August 13, 2006, at 19:33:06
In reply to Re: Lou's reply to Racer, posted by Toph on August 13, 2006, at 18:36:57
Toph,
You wrote,[...if others want clarification they can post for themselves...].
I do not generally post for others here. However, I have received many thanks from all over the world, some posted here, that say things like;
A. Lou , you make my day
B. Lou, you are worth the price of addmission here..]
C. Lou, you have helped me sit a little bit taller today...]
D. Lou, keep up the good work
E. other similar posts and emails to me.
If you are referring to my requests for a determination, even if Iam not posting for another, the answer that DR. Hsiung gives to the forum is to all the forum, not just me, so others could also benifit from knowing Dr. Hsiung's thinking.
If we can not ask Dr. Hsiung what his thinking is in regards to the guidlines of the forum,for any reason, how else could one know what his rules entail? Would not it be better to know than to not know? And would not others benifit from Dr. Hsiung telling the forum of his thinking?
When someone asks Dr. Hsiung to tell his thinking on a matter of as to if a statement is acceptable or not, for any reason, he could say either it is or it is not acceptable to his thinking. But the asker is asking only for one of those answers. And the asker is asking because he/she wants to know. Is wanting to know, for any reason, uncivil?
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:676011
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060802/msgs/676142.html