Posted by Lou Pilder on August 13, 2006, at 16:15:17
In reply to Lou's suggeation about the 3 consecutive post rule, posted by Lou Pilder on August 13, 2006, at 16:07:36
Friends,
Let us remember back when this came up. There was something about 100 posts.
What that referred to is that there was a topic that was so comprehensive, that I wrote thsat I would need 100 posts to cover it. I did not mean that I was telling others that they could not post, for that would not be in accordance with the guidlines of the forum, ie to tell other that they can not post.
So all that meant was that it could be a long topic, like the Effexor thread.
Then there is the issue of that people do not have to enter a thread, nor do they have to read what is in it.
So the proposal is...(next post)
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:676096
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060802/msgs/676098.html