Posted by barosky on August 3, 2005, at 23:25:13
In reply to Lou's response to barosky's post-sofew?, posted by Lou Pilder on August 3, 2005, at 21:00:22
> A. In your opinion, could the statement have the potential to mean that there are now only a >few members here that know anything?Yes it could, but I didn't intend to promote that message, I meant there were few members who had the outstanding amount of knowledge that chemist, larry hoover and , etc had.
> criteria?Criteria would be the amount of knowledge exhibited about a subject, it is pretty much understood who are the extraoridinarily knowledgable members of this board, and I think almost all of them have been banned
> C. In your opinion, does the statement in question have the potential to mean that there is a corrolation between knowlege of a member >with unsuitableness to the community? If so, what is your opinion of what the number could be >of the corrolation coefficient?
There is a correlation between knoweledgable members, and getting banned, many of the members that were banned just happened to be the *go to* person on this board.
> D. In your opinion, does the statement in question have the potential to mean that those >here now are not likly to be banned?
Yes, I wouldn't be surprised.> E. If someone here has never been banned, in your opinion, could the statement in question have the potential to mean that they are likly >to not know anything?
sigh,
No, it means they don't have the amount of impressive knolwedge that certain highly regarded members had.
> F. In your opinion, does the statement in question have the potential to mean that the more one knows the more likely it is that the member will be banned? If so, what is your opinion as to why that is?
> LouI don't know Dr. Bob's intentions, jelously?? Who knows, I really don't know what drives him..
poster:barosky
thread:534688
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050728/msgs/537302.html