Posted by Lou Pilder on June 15, 2005, at 11:36:35
In reply to Re: Lou's response to Dinah's post-stlvoic-hstlenv » Lou Pilder, posted by Dinah on June 15, 2005, at 11:25:14
> If the post has gone unadressed, then the question is answered, isn't it? The post was acceptable to Dr. Bob.
>
> You can argue with Dr. Bob that such statements shouldn't be acceptable.
>
> But the acceptability question has been answered, as the rules stand now.
>
> Even if you couldn't publicly complain about a particular post, you could say that the civility guidelines should be changed to include a statement that Dr. Bob now considers civil.
Dinah,
Are you you saying, as to what you wrote in your above post, that I could request that since there is a post in the catagory that I am prohibited to post, is posted, and it is thearfore acceptable because Dr. Hsiung did not write one way or the other as per my equest for determination of such is or is not putting down those of other faiths, that I should be allowed to post the prohibited post that is spoken of on the opening page of the faith board by me by asking him?
If so, then was that not already done here by you and others and myself already when you wrote in a post something like that Lou should be allowed to post the proposed post that Dr. Hsiung writes that he will expell me for if I post it?
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:511073
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050614/msgs/513121.html